How the pros and cons of spec work impact you
Speculative work (or spec work for short), for which work is undertaken before actually knowing if that work will be chosen and paid for by the client has become a heated topic in the last few years, especially with the creation of design contest sites. Spec work has been something I’ve been undecided about for a while but after reading several articles about it lately, I decided to give the whole subject more thought and share my humble opinion on how I believe designers and companies are impacted.
In the early years of my career I always thought of spec work as a norm in certain industries, take advertising for example. A company might ask a few selected agencies to pitch a concept which would normally include some unfinished artwork. From the company’s perspective, they get to see how a few agencies, chosen because of their work and reputation, would tackle their specific needs. The agencies taking part though, would have to spend their time and money on these pitches, but in the hope that if chosen by the company, they will gain financially by being engaged for an extended period of time, working on more than just the initially pitched work.
But over the years, especially more recently, when I think of spec work what comes to mind are all these design contest sites that have sprung up online. Which unlike the advertising example above, require designers have to produce finished artwork, with no guarantee of further money from that company for producing additional work. All on the understanding that their work is competing against many others so stands a far less chance of being selected and paid for. Before I go any further let me be clear, I do believe these contests are actually just spec work, disguised under the mantle of a contest. Though regardless of how we choose to label them, be it contests, crowdsourcing or crowdspecking, I think it’s the pros and cons that companies and designers can experience from this type of spec work that’s more important. Below these are listed, comparing spec work to the more traditional practice of choosing a designer before any artwork is produced, with the guarantee of payment at the end.
Companies Engaging in Spec Work
PROS
Save Money
Rather than a designer giving you a quote for producing your artwork, you can decide how much money you want to pay instead. This can save you a fair amount of money, but at what cost? Will the quality be the same? Will the designer take the time to understand your business and the image of your company? These are questions you should be asking yourself.
Wider Choice
Why settle for one designer creating artwork for you, if you can get dozens or even hundreds doing the same thing? Consider how you will deal with all these choices, decision making can be difficult, you’ll need clear focus to pick what’s best for your business and not just your own personal taste. This is the type of input you would usually get from a designer if engaged the traditional way (see Six Steps to Hassle Free Great Designs for more on this).
Quick Turnaround
Good designers can be busy people, in demand because of their reputation, so they usually require more notice before starting a project. Therefore, if you need artwork produced in a rush, you could instead use a design contest and possibly have it in a matter of days. There will surely be designers out there that can rush your design along, but do you really want rushed artwork? And will it satisfy your requirements and what if it doesn’t, will you have to start the whole process again? You could be lucky, or would you be better waiting a little bit longer to hire a designer you know can deliver the quality you need?
CONS
Lacks Originality
Without the guarantee of payment, how much time do you think a designer can give to your project? He will most likely not have the time to research your business or to brainstorm and sketch ideas. Instead he might rehash a past design that wasn’t chosen by another company or else search online for your type of business and use what he finds as inspiration for your artwork. This can be risky if another company notices the similarities, especially with logo design.
Less Specific
Again, because of the lack of time that can be given to a highly likely non paying job, the lack of research will mean that the final artwork will not be very specific to your company and what it stands for. There simply won’t be the time to learn enough about your business and to work through ideas to get to a solution that fits your business, unlike how a designer would usually work if you had hired him the traditional way.
Poor Quality
You could be very lucky and get someone with experience and talent creating your artwork, but as stated already, how much time can they give to your project, therefore what will the outcome be. But the more likely situation would be your artwork being produced by a young designer wanting to gain experience and produce work for their portfolio. There’s a good chance that they simply won’t have the experience to create the level of work needed and it’ll show. Do you really want your business to be associated with poor quality?
Designers Engaging in Spec Work
PROS
Earn Money
With the high amount of designers submitting designs, the chance of yours being selected is minimal. Even if you do spend as little time as possible on it, it’s still time that’s unlikely to bring a reward. You would be much better using your time trying to attract regular paying clients, think of new ways to market yourself or develop new skills that will make you appeal more to new clients.
Gain Experience
If you’re a student or just starting out in design and need to gain experience and build up your portfolio then spec work might be an option, but it’s certainly not the best option you could take. It’s very unlikely that your artwork will be chosen and there will be little feedback. You’d be much better off working for small, local businesses for a reduced rate or even for free to build up experience. At least this way you’ll be able to discuss the project in detail and get regular feedback from them (see Six Steps to Hassle Free Client Approval for more on this) and they may even become regular clients if they like your work.
Get Exposure
How much exposure you as a designer will gain from doing spec work is questionable. Companies go to these contest sites to get artwork, they are not there looking for designers to hire the usual way, they wouldn’t be there in the first place if that’s what they wanted. So you need to ask yourself what benefits you’ll get from being known on these sites, surely only fellow designers competing against you may remember your name.
CONS
Time Wasted
The chances of your work being selected are pretty slim, so any time you spend will probably be wasted. Sure, you may gain some experience in the process, but without proper feedback how useful will that experience be. Also, if you want to produce portfolio pieces, unless you are willing to put in the necessary hours, they will not amount to much? And can you afford to use so much of your time this way, without the guarantee of payment at the end?
Lost Enthusiasm
There’s a real risk that continually producing artwork that is never selected will result in you loosing enthusiasm for design or even have you questioning your own abilities. Design is a hard business to be in anyway, with lots of competition, so you don’t need the extra pressure of competing on each project with dozens or hundreds of other designers. If you do get to this stage, rather than questioning your skill, ask yourself why you feel the need to produce spec work and see what other options are out there.
Financial Loss
Not only will you have to risk spending your time creating artwork that most likely will reap no reward but even if your artwork were selected, the payment would usually be less than if you had been hired traditionally. Also, your reputation could be effected if it were to get out that you enter these types of design contests. Imagine a client finding out how little value you place on your abilities, they would certainly not want to pay more and it could impact how they view your work too. So if you do produce this type of spec work, at least don’t use your real name.
After weighting up the pros and cons as I see them, I think it’s pretty clear for you to tell what my own personal views are on this type of spec work, though in the end it comes down to choice. It’s up to the individual company or designer to choose what is best for them and how they want to be perceived. There will always be companies out there that want to pay as little as possible and if they are willing to accept the level of design that brings, who am I to complain. And for the designers out there, who for whatever reason choose to do spec work, if they are happy to then it’s none of my business. The spectrum of design can be wide, from the awful to the exceptional, from the totally free to the highly expensive, from the copied idea to the original concept. We decide for ourselves where in that range we want to fit, it’s our choice. PG
(Main image) Spec You poster by Von Glitschka.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please Tweet or Recommend it (or both).
And most of all, I'd love to hear your thoughts on what's been discussed in this article, so please share your views by adding a comment below.


In my case “experience” is the last thing I need. No, i don’t mean I am too good, but at least now the work I’d do should be paid for. This is why I don’t enter any speculative work jobs and, if a client comes with such ideas, I’d respectfully direct him to a contest site where people kill themselves to get noticed. When you contact a designer with a good portfolio, you kinda know he’s the one. Most clients who’d work in this way are not serious. A serious client contacts me to tell me “saw your stuff, work with me”, doesn’t ask me to create mockups just to play “boss” :D
Even if I also work with fellow freelancers in few occasions, I always hire directly based on portfolio and ratings. I don’t do contests or ask for unpaid work.
Dojo :
Even if someone does need “experience” there are better options out there to get some, I really can’t see a benefit in using a contest site. And like you said, clients that use these sites can’t be very serious, or could it be that they lack confidence or experience in choosing a designer, so consider having the chance to choose between lots of finished artwork an “easier” option for them.
Nice even handed and level headed look at the spec work issue from all sides. You’re absolutely right – it’s up to the individual designer to pick their poison in terms of participating or not. When we create artwork it’s ours to do with what we want, and if designers want to pitch it on some spec site, that’s up to them.
Having said that, it’s an atrocious way to make a living with average win rates in the 3 – 8% range. Even noticeably ‘better’ designers don’t fare much better, with win rates hovering around the 10% range. The drop off in participation numbers is extraordinary with the vast majority or participants bailing after a couple of contests. Most ‘community’ numbers posted on the home pages are wildly inflated and/or include people who haven’t as much as logged in for months, or even years.
Buyers like these sites because they believe they’re getting ‘more for less’ (though wading through 160 crap designs to get to one decent one seems like a terrible waste for everyone involved). The sites like them because their ‘work force’ – employees in the real world – are producing work product for jack. Ultimately, it’s the designers who are getting the short end of things at every turn.
Steve Douglas said:
Those percentages are so so low, no wonder designers soon lose interest and move on. It’s just a shame there are always more designers to take their places, until they themselves move on and so it continues.
And as you say Steve, it can’t be good for the person running the contest either, having to wade through all those poor designs; they must end up really confused by the end; no wonder many don’t even end up choosing a winner. Hopefully they have learn’t a lesson and will hire a designer the traditional way in future.
For the last three years I have been working at a small design / print shop. We put out a monthly publication which is entirely paid for by the advertisers and we do a lot of spec ads for potential clients. I have seen both the good and the bad, and I can’t say I stand firmly on one side or the other. We have gained many new clients from spec ads, and there’s no question in my mind that showing a client a spec ad is more likely to work as opposed to, “Hey, we can put together a nice ad in our magazine for you, just take our word for it!”. On the other hand, I have seen spec ads with entirely too much time put into them get declined as well.
In regards to the design contests, I am not a big fan of most of those websites. For myself, I don’t think they are worth the time. I think the creators of those type of sites just thought up of a way to make some quick money. In general I support competition and there is no way to grow without it, but as Steve mentioned, with such a low win rate, it begs the question, “What’s the point?”, I also think the quality of the work is generally sub par. There is too much “assembly line” design, where no thought is put into it. Instead of taking the time to create interesting concepts, it becomes “How many logo contests can I enter?”.
Paul – Thank you for another intriguing article. Even if it is Sunday, it’s nice to make my brain do some work, haha.
@ Ryan Cowles :
Thanks for your comment Ryan, it was good to read your thoughts on speculative adverts. I personally don’t see the harm in a business producing spec ads of the type you mentioned, after all, they are choosing to do this themselves so it’s up to them how much time and money they want to throw at it. If the business can gain enough advertisers / clients to cover the time spent on ads not paid for then all is good.
At the end of the day I think whether any spec work is good or bad comes down to who instigated it, designer or client.